Ribbons of Scarlet Read online

  Dedication

  This novel is dedicated to the women who fight, to the women who stand on principle. It is an homage to the women who refuse to back down even in the face of repression, slander, and death. History is replete with you, even if we are not taught that, and the present moment is full of you—brave, determined, and laudable.

  Contents

  Cover

  Title Page

  Dedication

  Foreword by Allison Pataki

  Part I: The Philosopher by Stephanie Dray

  Part II: The Revolutionary by Heather Webb

  Part III: The Princess by Sophie Perinot

  Part IV: The Politician by Kate Quinn

  Part V: The Assassin by E. Knight

  Part VI: The Beauty by Laura Kamoie

  Epilogue

  Acknowledgments

  P.S. Insights, Interviews & More . . .*

  About the Authors

  About the Book

  Copyright

  About the Publisher

  Foreword

  Liberté, égalité, fraternité. That rallying cry, along with the new “Marseillaise” national anthem and the tricolor flag, emerged as one of the French Revolution’s most vaunted and inspiring calls to action. And yet, at a time when French reformers, philosophers, and revolutionaries boldly trumpeted the equality of citizens and fought for the expansion of rights both civil and human, they largely, if not surprisingly, meant the rights of men. Liberty, equality, fraternity, after all.

  But what of the sisterhood? What of the women who believed, suffered, fought, and died? Now is the time for the novel in your hands. Ribbons of Scarlet is an important and invaluable gift for readers because it presents a full half of the story that has heretofore gone largely untold, buried in the history pages that were penned primarily by and for men these past three centuries. The backdrop could not be more of a reader’s—and writer’s—dream. If history provides the best raw material for compelling fiction (and I believe it does), then the French Revolution provides arguably the most compelling historical moment in modern Western history upon which to base that fiction. Compelling, yes, but even more than that: singularly dramatic in its grandiosity, incredible in the scope of both its events and its players, important in its lessons of the best and worst of human nature, and endlessly intriguing in just how jaw-droppingly juicy its raw material proves.

  What is less well known about the French Revolution, however, is the leading role in which women fought to bring about some of its most important triumphs and inspiring changes. From influential salonnières in glittering drawing rooms to the hungry peasant women who marched on Versailles to demand bread, women were waving the tricolor at the forefront of the Revolution. This “best of times . . . worst of times” era marks one of the earliest appearances in the Western world of women demanding expanded rights—including the right to vote. Their thinking was shockingly modern on issues as diverse as gender equality, racial equality, judicial reform, and the distribution of society’s wealth. As such, the attitudes of the women in this book may even seem unlikely in how evolved and contemporary they feel to us, but these were truly women ahead of their time, and there is no attitude espoused in Ribbons of Scarlet that was not in fact historically espoused. The impact of these female revolutionaries and their struggles still reverberates today.

  And yet, wherever these women fell on the socioeconomic spectrum, on whichever side of the struggle these women found themselves, they shared an immutable commonality: they were defined, judged, even condemned based on their gender. These women experienced the age-old sexism encompassed in the French saying “cherchez la femme”—search for the woman—that makes women convenient scapegoats, implying that women are naturally troublemakers and always to blame.

  Many stories of the French Revolution are tragic, and many of the stories of the women of the French Revolution—royals, aristocrats, bourgeois, and peasants—are tragic. But even tragedies can inspire, and they can certainly teach. And the authors of Ribbons of Scarlet, in bringing to life such a varied, meaningful, and worthy cast of characters, are doing just that: they are not only entertaining us, they are teaching, inspiring, and even transporting us.

  The French Revolution was complicated, and so, too, were the living and breathing women who rose and fell through its turbulent years, the women who fill the pages of this novel. These women are not simply virtuous heroines or evil villainesses. The authors of Ribbons of Scarlet show that like these women, the Revolution as a whole, and particularly women’s experience of it, was marked by cataclysmic change and conflicting beliefs, brutality and community, rapidly shifting alliances and new factions sprouting up by the day.

  So, reader, you now have the chance to enter Paris during these years for a front-row seat to all the action and drama. You’ll meet an enlightened noblewoman whose privilege provides both opportunity and obstacle. A streetwise revolutionary who hungers not just for bread but for justice. A Bourbon princess who fights for her family even as God, king, and nation are ripped from her royal hands. A patriot with a passion to serve her new republic, only to find that both her pen and her voice are silenced by the self-serving radicals in power. A woman of faith whose commitment to the Revolution sharpens to the tip of a knife. And a belle of Parisian society whose beauty and charm launch her to such heights that these same gifts soon turn to fatal burdens.

  Each one of these stories, like the real-life women within them, stands on its own. And yet, when taken in its entirety, the novel provides a whole view of a conflict that was peopled by living, bleeding, inspiring, and complicated individuals who each have an important and unique voice. We are better for reading these tales and knowing these stories. We are enriched by this novel’s meaningful quest to “search for the woman,” to bring their voices to the fore, and to find a rallying cry all its own: liberty, equality, sorority.

  Allison Pataki

  Part I

  The Philosopher

  Freedom is the first need of the human heart.

  —Sophie de Grouchy, in her Letters on Sympathy

  Paris, Spring 1786

  Sympathy is our most natural and moral sense. And its origin is pain. From our first wail of infancy, we’re creatures who suffer. Perhaps women most of all. From cradle to grave, we gather bruises, scrapes, and cuts. And all of us—from peasant to queen—stumble and fall.

  What’s more, every injury hurts infinitely. First, when the bone breaks. Then in every remembrance of it, such that when we see another person in pain, we feel the echo in our own body.

  That’s why, blinded by tears, I shuddered with every crack of the hammer over the scene of torture playing out before me in the majestic place de Grève, where a doomed prisoner screamed for mercy as the executioner shattered his bones.

  I didn’t know the condemned criminal strapped to the cartwheel. I didn’t know his family. I didn’t even know if he was guilty. I had no relation to him whatsoever except the most important one—that we were both human beings. But when the executioner raised the steel rod to break the victim’s forearm, I quite nearly prayed for him to miss his mark and kill the man. Let the blow end his suffering. Let the victim’s senses go quickly, like mine were beginning to as I grasped my uncle’s gloved hand to fight off a swoon.

  But I didn’t pray, because this suffering to which I bore witness was in the name of the king’s justice, supposedly ordained by a god I didn’t believe existed.

  Any god who ordained this would be a devil. And I didn’t believe in devils, either, unless they be men.

  “I shouldn’t have brought you, Sophie,” Uncle Charles whispered as, in anticipation of death, black crows gathered on the rooftop of the nearby Hôtel de Ville. “Come away now.”
/>
  His voice was a rasp of emotion with an uncomfortable awareness of the peasantry, for whom this horrific spectacle was meant to be both entertainment . . . and a warning. Those peasants bold enough to peek up from beneath dirtied caps to look at me and my uncle seemed to say, You don’t belong here. And perhaps we didn’t. Though I wore only a plain somber gray Brunswick gown unadorned by ribbon or lace, and my uncle was dressed in black, the people knew aristocrats on sight.

  They also knew that even minor aristocracy, like my family, would never be made to suffer the torment of being broken upon the wheel, shrieking and begging for a swift death. We had the money and connections to avoid such a fate. The common people knew it and I knew it too.

  So I didn’t obey my uncle, but smeared away my tears, forcing myself to watch as the screaming wretch’s bones were shattered, brittle ends breaking through skin, spattering crimson blood on the cobbles. His screams were indescribable, but they seared my soul, and I reminded myself that I was here because of my uncle’s important work—our work, he often flattered me to say . . .

  Uncle Charles was a magistrate, not a street vendor hawking his wares. But he knew we might be the only chance to end suffering like this, and for that reason he addressed the crowd. “I represent three peasants of Chaumont who’ve been sentenced to die this same way,” he told the knot of people standing nearest. “I authored a defense of them.” I held one of his pamphlets now, crumpled in the tightness of my grip as my uncle raised his voice. “Perhaps you’ve read it . . .”

  His words made no impression upon a burly bricklayer who had climbed atop a crate for a better view and cheered every hammer blow. But we’d captured the attention of a fishwife in brown homespun and a young fruit seller in dirtied skirts, basket in hand and tears in her eyes. Neither were likely to have the education that would allow them to read my uncle’s pamphlet, but they’d heard about the three peasants of Chaumont. Oh yes, they’d heard. And word passed.

  “It’s Charles Dupaty,” someone whispered. “He’s here.”

  My uncle had gained renown (or perhaps infamy) by taking on the case, and more heads turned our way when he shouted, “Three innocent men! Forgotten by our barbaric system of criminal justice, left to rot in prison for thirty months, then condemned without evidence or credible witnesses!”

  A priest in the crowd hissed at us, “For shame.”

  I did feel shame for using the occasion of one man’s death to draw attention to the plight of three others. The dying man deserved, perhaps, the witness of every person for his suffering. But we couldn’t save him. We could only, if we were lucky, deprive the executioner of his audience and make the end quicker for the dying man.

  “If the three peasants of Chaumont were rich men,” Uncle Charles continued, undaunted, “they’d never have been forgotten in jail. Rich men would’ve been able to appeal . . .”

  My part, now, was to say what my uncle couldn’t. Ordinarily, it outraged me that the things women said were easily dismissed, but now I wished to take advantage of it. I was just twenty-two. I’d be thought a termagant for speaking about legal matters in public, but not a criminal. So with at least fifty pairs of eyes trained upon us, I found my voice. “But rather than reform a merciless system that celebrates suffering, the Paris Parlement resorts to judicial murder.”

  Several men turned with hostile glares. “Good thing you’re a beauty,” one snarled. If I were not a noblewoman on a magistrate’s arm, he would’ve beaten me into silence.

  As I swallowed my fear, murmurs in the crowd grew louder, nearly drowning out the screams of the shattered man. Sensing the change, the executioner ended the prisoner’s suffering with the coup de grâce—a blow to the torso that ruptured every organ.

  Then all was silent.

  The dead body was left upon the wheel, like carrion to be pecked by crows. Some words were chanted about how the criminal’s suffering purged us all of sin. Someone else said a prayer, acknowledging our submission to the king. Then the soldiers commanded us to go . . . but some people sullenly took copies of our pamphlet as they went.

  Long after our carriage rolled away, the dead man’s screams still echoed in my ears, and I retched out the window, my sour vomit spattering the cobbled streets of Paris.

  “Poor Grouchette,” Uncle Charles said, using my childhood nickname as I fought another wave of nausea. “However brave you are, you’re still a gently bred young lady. Now I fear you may never sleep again.”

  “Should I?” I asked with a sob as the horses clopped along. “Should any of us sleep while things like this take place? It seems as if the whole world has closed their eyes to injustice.”

  And I wanted to shake the world awake.

  But first, I’d have to get hold of myself. Uncle Charles valued rationality not emotion. I feared that if I couldn’t stem my tears, he might trust me less in the great legal matter he’d undertaken at risk to his career and our family reputation. A fear that was confirmed when he pressed into my palm a silver flask of brandy with which to rinse my mouth and said, “I think it’s time you bow to the wishes of your parents.”

  “Not that again, not now,” I pleaded, taking a gulp to cleanse my tongue.

  I’d just seen a man die. It was obscene to speak of my future when the executed man had none.

  My parents wanted me to marry—a fate I dreaded. In helping my uncle with his practice of the law, I’d learned the myriad ways in which husbands abused their power. And even if I were ignorant of that, there remained the regrettable reality that my heart already belonged to a young man I could never marry.

  A good and brave soldier who risked his life, fortune, and freedom in the cause of liberty. But because my love was a shameful secret, I only said, “You know I’ve no wish to take a husband, Uncle. I’m much happier to devote myself to our causes like a nun to Christ.”

  My uncle managed a small smile, perhaps remembering the family row when I renounced my faith. My kindhearted mother had sobbed against her rosary beads. My father, the Marquis de Grouchy, barked, “I’ll have no godless girl under my roof!”

  Only Uncle Charles took my part in the matter.

  Sophie is special, he’d argued. She consumes Rousseau and Voltaire like breathing air. She’s conversant in every subject. Let her leave off the prayer beads, the embroidery, and other feminine occupations. Sophie is a scholar with a man’s mind.

  Of course, I didn’t feel as if I were a man in body or mind. And I believed other young ladies would be scholars if only such qualities were prized and encouraged in us. Nevertheless, I didn’t protest against my uncle’s defense, because he’d persuaded my parents to allow me to study with him. If she were a man, I’d take her for a legal apprentice. She’ll be a great help to me . . .

  I liked to think I had been a great help to Uncle Charles during the past year while we fought to save the lives of three condemned peasants. I’d fetched books, researched precedents, taken notes, suggested arguments, and carried his writings to the printer. I’d even suggested that he sell his pamphlet, the funds for which might be used for the benefit of the prisoners. I truly believed we’d save them.

  But now in the carriage beside me Uncle Charles said, very gravely, “It’s not going to end well, Sophie. My clients will likely die upon the wheel, just as that man did today, and it’ll likely be the last case I ever take.”

  “You can’t mean it,” I said. “Every day we’re overwhelmed by pleas to help other unfortunates condemned by the king’s so-called justice.”

  Even if we didn’t save our three prisoners, we might still make a difference. Not just through charity but by opening the public’s eyes. That’s what my uncle had said at the start, but now he took the wig from his head and rubbed at his thinning gray hair. “I have reason to believe the judges of the Paris Parlement will retaliate against me.”

  That hardly seemed fair since my uncle’s pamphlet hadn’t accused any judge of corruption. He’d merely pointed out the unfairness in the system
of the ancien régime. “They’ll see reason,” I argued. “They’re learned men. They can learn to see the humanity of peasants and a kinder way of justice.”

  “My darling niece, were your passion alone to count upon the scales of justice, France would be a better nation. But I can no longer shield you from the expectations of society. I’ve brought the king’s disapproval down on the family name. It will be up to you to redeem it with a brilliant marriage.”

  I didn’t see how my marriage—brilliant or otherwise—would do anything for the Grouchy name, considering that I’d have to give it up. The family hopes more properly rested upon my brother, the heir to my father’s title. But the lines of worry on my beloved uncle’s face made me wish to give comfort. “I don’t believe you have brought down the king’s disapproval upon us, Uncle Charles. I don’t believe the king knows half the crimes committed in his name while he gorges himself on dainties at Versailles without any concern whatsoever for the people over whom he rules.”

  “Be fair-minded,” Uncle Charles chided, as he always did when my passions got ahead of me. I did not like to be strident, but I had, as Maman often told me, an unladylike temper. “King Louis is still relatively young, and those who know him say he’s well intentioned. He can learn, if he’s well advised. But I’m not enough connected at court to have the king’s ear.”

  Neither was my father.

  If we wanted to save the lives of the three peasants and save my uncle’s career—not to mention preserve me from an unwelcome marriage—we’d need the support of someone very wealthy and sympathetic to our cause. Someone with the bravery of a lion. Someone both respected by the king and beloved by ordinary people. And of course, at that time, there was only one such man in France.

  The Marquis de Lafayette.

  The very man with whom I fancied myself so helplessly in love.

  “IT’S DISGRACEFUL ENOUGH that you skipped Mass,” Maman said, catching me in the parlor with my charcoal and sketchbook, my mending unfinished, the doors of our Paris apartments thrown open to the courtyard where my little cousins ran wild without supervision. “Must you also set such an unladylike example?”